Chapter 7 Migration Cues

⬇ Download this chapter

7.1 Overview

This submodel simulates how migratory fish detect environmental cues that signal the onset of migration, based on the interaction between photoperiod and temperature, which are widely recognized as primary drivers of migration timing in anadromous fishes. Photoperiod provides a seasonal signal regulating physiological readiness, while temperature modifies the timing of migration initiation and can act as a releasing factor (e.g., Zydlewski et al. (2014); García-Vega et al. (2022)). In this model, migration begins when individuals experience a coincident decline in both daylength and temperature (ΔL < 0 and ΔT < 0 on the same day), representing a simplified autumnal cue window. These events are classified as cue days, during which individuals stochastically accumulate the probability of initiating migration. For predators such as striped bass, migration probability is additionally linked to alewife presence, integrating species interactions into migration onset.

Rather than assuming a fixed threshold, this formulation represents migration cues as periods of coincident decline in environmental conditions, capturing seasonal transitions that trigger movement. This cue formulation is applied specifically to upstream migration and is site-specific, requiring evaluation and potential recalibration for other systems. Downstream migration is not explicitly cued and instead emerges from the model following completion of migration objectives such as spawning or foraging.

7.2 Purpose

The purpose of this submodel is to mechanistically trigger migration using real, observed environmental phenology rather than arbitrary or date-based rules. This framework captures how:

  • Changes in ΔTemperature and ΔDaylength structure seasonality
  • Migration timing emerges pragmatically rather than being fixed
  • Fish respond to external conditions and species interactions
  • Environmental preprocessing in R feeds into NetLogo behavioral rules

This allows migration in the model to originate from measurable ecological drivers instead of hard-coded thresholds.

7.3 Entities, State Variables, and Scales

7.3.1 Spatial and Temporal Scales

  • Spatial Unit: Patch (3 m x 3 m resolution)
  • Temporal Unit: 5-minute time steps (tick)

7.3.2 Global Variables

Global Variable Definition
cue-table Lookup table containing ΔTemperature, ΔDaylength, their smoothed values, and Boolean coincident-decline flags (from R preprocessing)
cue-days List of day-of-year values where ΔT < 0 and ΔL < 0 simultaneously (identified in R)
ΔT Daily rate of change in temperature imported from R (dT_per_day_f or smoothed dT_smooth)
ΔL Daily rate of change in photoperiod imported from R (dL_per_day_min or smoothed dL_smooth)
cue-active? Whether the current day-of-year corresponds to a coincident decline day
migration-trigger? Whether environmental signals are strong enough to begin building migration probability

7.3.3 Patch Variables

Migration cues do not depend on patch-level conditions. No patch-scale variables are required.

7.3.4 Agent Variables

Variable Definition
migration-trigger? Whether the agent has entered a window where migration probability begins to accumulate
migration-probability The cumulative probability of initiating migration, updated each tick once the trigger is active
start-migration? Whether the individual has begun active migration

7.4 Process Overview and Scheduling

  1. Environmental Inputs (from R)

External R preprocessing computes:

  • ΔTemperature per day
  • ΔDaylength per day
  • Smoothed 3-day rolling means
  • Boolean both_negative indicating coincident decline
  • Exports full dataset as "cue_dataset_full.csv"

This dataset defines the environmental basis for triggering migration.

  1. When a cue day is detected, activate the migration cue, defined by coincident declines in the rate of change of temperature and photoperiod, and enable migration readiness.

  2. For agents with an active migration trigger, individual migration probability is incremented at each simulation time step (tick).

  3. When an agent’s migration probability exceeds a stochastic threshold, initiate migration.

7.5 Design Concepts

Basic Principles: The mechanism reflects literature on the interaction between photoperiod and temperature as drivers of migration timing in anadromous fishes, where migration responses emerge from the combined influence of seasonal and short-term environmental signals (e.g., Zydlewski et al. (2014); García-Vega et al. (2022); Jonsson (1991)).

Emergence: Migration timing varies among individuals (Dingle 2014) and is represented in the model through stochastic variation in the accumulation of migration probability, resulting in asynchronous migration initiation across agents.

Adaptation: Agents transition from staging to active migration in response to environmental cue activation and internal readiness state.

Stochasticity: Stochasticity enters through probabilistic accumulation of migration readiness and random threshold exceedance for migration initiation.

Observation: Key outputs include cue activation timing, individual migration probability trajectories, and the proportion of agents initiating migration through time.

7.6 Initialization

Variable Initial Value Justification
cue-days Extracted from CSV Based on empirical environmental data
migration-probability 0 Ensures probability is accumulated only within cue window
migration-trigger? false No cue until ΔT and ΔL decline
cue-active? false Depends on DOY
start-migration? false Fish begin in staging mode

7.7 Submodels

7.7.1 Identifying Cue Days (Preprocessed in R)

\[ \Delta T < 0, \;\; \Delta L < 0 \hspace{2cm} \text{(7.1)} \]

Where:

  • \(\Delta T\) is the change in temperature used to flag cue days.
  • \(\Delta L\) is the change in photoperiod proxy used to flag cue days.

The preprocessing script:

  1. Computes ΔT and ΔL
  2. Applies smoothing
  3. Flags coincident declines

7.7.2 Activation of Migration Cue

At each simulation day, the model checks whether the current day-of-year corresponds to a predefined cue day. If true, the migration cue is activated:

\[ cue\text{-}active? = \text{true} \hspace{2cm} \text{(7.2)} \]

Where:

  • \(cue\text{-}active?\) is the indicator that migration cue is active.

This represents the environmental system state in which the cue has occurred, after which agents respond by transitioning to an internal readiness state:

\[ migration\text{-}trigger? = \text{true} \hspace{2cm} \text{(7.3)} \]

Where:

  • \(migration\text{-}trigger?\) is the indicator of migration readiness.

This marks the onset of migration preparedness for all agents, where an individual has sensed the cue and transitions to an internally primed state. In migratory organisms, environmental signals are sensed first and then establish readiness, after which movement is initiated only when conditions are favorable rather than immediately upon cue detection (Dingle 2014).

7.7.3 Accumulation of Migration Probability

For each agent with an active migration trigger, migration probability increases stochastically each tick:

\[ P_{t+1} = P_{t} + \left(0.00001 + U(0, 0.00004)\right) \hspace{2cm} \text{(7.4)} \]

Where:

  • \(P_{t}\) is the individual migration probability at time \(t\).

Migration probability is capped at:

\[ P_{t} \le 1 \hspace{2cm} \text{(7.5)} \]

Where:

  • \(P_{t}\) is the individual migration probability at time \(t\).

This formulation produces gradual increase into migration and individual variation in migration timing.

7.7.4 Initiate Migration

An agent initiates migration when its migration probability exceeds a stochastic threshold:

\[ random\text{-}float(1) < P_{t} \hspace{2cm} \text{(7.6)} \]

Where:

  • \(P_{t}\) is the individual migration probability at time \(t\).

When this condition is met:

\[ start\text{-}migration? = \text{true} \hspace{2cm} \text{(7.7)} \]

Where:

  • \(start\text{-}migration?\) is the indicator that migration has begun.

The agent transitions from staging behavior to directed migratory movement.

7.8 Netlogo Implementation

References

Dingle, Hugh. 2014. Migration: The Biology of Life on the Move. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press.
García-Vega, Ana, Juan Francisco Fuentes-Pérez, Pedro M. Leunda Urretabizkaia, José Ardaiz Ganuza, and Francisco Javier Sanz-Ronda. 2022. “Upstream Migration of Anadromous and Potamodromous Brown Trout: Patterns and Triggers in a 25-Year Overview.” Hydrobiologia 849 (1): 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-021-04720-9.
Jonsson, Nina. 1991. “Influence of Water Flow, Water Temperature and Light on Fish Migration in Rivers.” Nordic Journal of Freshwater Research 66: 20–35.
Zydlewski, G. B., D. S. Stich, and S. D. McCormick. 2014. “Photoperiod Control of Downstream Movements of Atlantic Salmon Salmo Salar Smolts.” Journal of Fish Biology 85 (4): 1023–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12509.